The Great Emu War of 1932: The Time Australia Lost a War to Birds

In 1932, Australia sent the actual army to fight a bird. Machine guns, trained soldiers, the works. The bird had a beak and the sheer audacity to not stand still. Reader, the bird won.

We wish we were exaggerating for a laugh, but we're not — this is a real, documented stretch of Australian military history, and it is exactly as ridiculous as it sounds. Grab a cuppa, because the full story is even funnier than the headline.

So Why Did We Declare War on a Bird?

Picture Western Australia's Wheatbelt in the early 1930s: thousands of World War I veterans had been handed farming blocks under a "soldier settlement" scheme, mostly on tough, unforgiving land out around Campion. Then the Great Depression turned up uninvited. The government had talked these farmers into ramping up wheat production with subsidies that, by 1932, had quietly failed to materialise.

And then, as if on cue, around 20,000 emus finished their breeding season inland and decided the Wheatbelt's lovely, freshly irrigated farmland looked like a five-star buffet. They flattened crops. They barged through rabbit-proof fencing, letting rabbits pour in behind them for a bonus round of destruction. For farmers already drowning in debt and drought, this was the final straw, and a group of ex-soldiers went to the Minister of Defence and asked, essentially, "can we borrow some machine guns?" Incredibly, the answer was yes — partly because someone thought it would make excellent newsreel footage.

In hindsight, this is where things started going wrong.

The Battle(s), and We Use That Word Generously

Soldiers with a Lewis machine gun during the 1932 Emu War in Western Australia

Soldiers and a Lewis machine gun on operation during the Emu War, 1932. Image: Wikimedia Commons (public domain).

Command went to Major G.P.W. Meredith of the Royal Australian Artillery, backed by Sergeant S. McMurray and Gunner J. O'Halloran, armed with two Lewis machine guns and roughly 10,000 rounds of ammunition. On paper: humans 2, emus 0. In practice, the emus had apparently read the army's playbook and burned it.

It turns out emus do not line up politely to be shot. They scatter into small groups, each seemingly with its own lookout bird watching for trouble, and they do not hold still for anyone. During the first operation (2–8 November 1932), the soldiers got maybe fifty birds neatly lined up — and the gun jammed after a dozen kills, with the rest sprinting off into the scrub. Someone then had the bright idea of mounting a gun on a truck for a mobile pursuit. The emus, casually, outran the truck.

By the end of that first week, confirmed kills sat somewhere between fifty and a few hundred, against thousands of rounds fired. It was embarrassing enough that the operation was pulled on 8 November, and it's on the way out that Major Meredith delivered the line that's been quoted ever since: "If we had a military division with the bullet-carrying capacity of these birds it would face any army in the world. They can face machine guns with the invulnerability of tanks." A Major, conceding defeat, to a bird. Genuinely one of the great sentences in Australian history.

Farmers kept complaining, so the army went back for round two (13 November–10 December 1932), with somewhat better results — Meredith reported about 100 kills a week this time. His final tally claimed 986 confirmed emus for 9,860 rounds fired, which is roughly ten bullets per bird, plus a hopeful estimate that another 2,500 wounded ones might have died later off-camera. Historians have, politely, raised an eyebrow at that second number.

Who Actually Won? (It's Not the Army)

Australian soldiers resting during the 1932 Emu War operation

Soldiers taking a breather during the Emu War campaign, Western Australia, 1932. Image: Wikimedia Commons (public domain).

Ten thousand rounds. Two machine guns. The better part of two months. Final score: a few thousand dead birds out of a population of roughly 20,000, most of which strolled off to keep eating wheat completely unbothered. The whole affair became a punchline at home and overseas, and "the Emu War" has stuck around ever since as the go-to phrase for "we had every advantage and somehow still lost."

Here's the kicker: the actual crop problem did eventually get solved — just not by the military. Western Australia switched to paying farmers a bounty for emu scalps, and in a single six-month stretch in 1934, farmers claimed 57,034 of them. Better fencing did the rest. Turns out the people who actually lived on the land, armed with local knowledge and a modest cash incentive, outperformed an army unit with heavy weaponry. Military strategists have genuinely cited the Emu War since as a case study in what happens when firepower meets an opponent that simply refuses to form a tidy, shootable line.

Nearly a century on, it still sounds too silly to be real: a fully equipped artillery detachment sent out with machine guns to sort out a bird problem, and coming home having been thoroughly out-manoeuvred by, well, birds. No shade on the soldiers — they were handed an impossible job and did their best against an enemy that wouldn't play fair. But if you ever needed proof that Australian wildlife does not care about your plans, this is Exhibit A. The emus never surrendered. Turns out they never had to.

Need some wonderful and wacky gifting of your own? Head over to quirksy.com.au for more quirky finds — no machine guns required.